Professionally Managed Landscaping Businesses vs Construction
- Richard Matthews
- May 5
- 2 min read

If you're looking to invest in or scale a professionally managed landscaping business or a project-based construction company, it's critical to understand how they compare — particularly when the owner is off the tools and supported by a team of five or more.
This blog breaks down key differences between these two models, focusing on business structure, scalability, team dynamics, and valuations — all tailored to the Australian SME market.
What Defines a "Professionally Managed" Trade Business?
In this context, we’re referring to businesses where:
The owner works off the tools, managing via systems and a second-tier team leader (e.g., site supervisor or ops manager).
There are 5+ employees including admin or sales support.
The business has some level of process maturity — quoting systems, scheduling software, and basic reporting.
This structure changes everything about how the business operates — and how it’s valued.
Business Model Comparison: Landscaping vs Construction
Feature | Landscaping Business | Construction Business |
Type of Work | Garden builds, soft/hard landscaping, paving | Residential builds, renovations, fit-outs |
Project Duration | Days to weeks | Weeks to months |
Average Job Size | $5k – $50k | $50k – $500k+ |
Margin Profile | Medium–high, depends on quoting accuracy | High risk, tight margins on fixed-price jobs |
Team Roles | Landscapers, site foreman, scheduler/admin | Qualified trades, apprentices, project manager |
Compliance Burden | Moderate (OH&S, plant ticketing) | High (licensing, insurances, certifications) |
Customer Type | Residential, strata, builders | Developers, builders, homeowners |
Working Capital Risk | Moderate (deposits common) | High (progress claims, retentions) |
Owner Off the Tools? Here's Why That Matters
When a business reaches the stage where the owner doesn’t wear steel caps daily, it gains:
Higher saleability – buyers prefer businesses with operational independence.
Stronger valuation multiples – because the business isn't "the owner".
More scalability – leadership can focus on marketing, quoting, or expansion.
Valuation Multiples in Practice
Here’s what we typically see in today’s market for professionally managed operations (based on recent SME transactions in Australia):
Business Type | Typical EV/EBITDA Range | Notes |
Landscaping (team-led) | 2.5x – 3.5x | Higher if government/strata contracts exist |
Construction (residential) | 2.0x – 3.0x | Tends to be capped unless contract base is deep |
Construction (specialised) | 3.0x – 4.0x | Must show recurring builder relationships |
⚠️ In Australia, 4x EBITDA is not the average — it's the exception.
What Buyers Look For in Manager-Led Trades Businesses
Second-in-command who can run day-to-day without the owner
Clean project data (cost tracking, profitability by job)
Strong pipeline (forward work booked or under contract)
Reliable team (low staff turnover, systems training in place)
Documented quoting and scheduling systems
Final Thoughts: Which Is More Attractive?
Both business types can scale — but landscaping is often:
Easier to systemise,
Lower on compliance,
And faster to cashflow.
Construction has bigger ticket size upside — but also carries:
Higher working capital risk,
Licensing hurdles,
And more legal exposure.
For buyers wanting “hands-off” management and stable ROI, a well-run landscaping business ticks more boxes, more often.
Comments